Newton‘s three laws of motion may be stated as follows: Every object in a state of uniform motion will remain in that state of motion unless an external force acts on it. Force equals mass times acceleration [ ]. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Newton’s laws are not specific in areas of body, mind, and soul and are therefore only currently accepted laws for objects. With the “Object Oriented Programming” the Third Law is in dispute and the requirement for an “Equal and Opposite Reaction” may not be necessary to this equation and in Human Physics where Criminal Activity and Violence is concerned, it is important to monitor these “motions” and “actions” to protect from further victimization. It is also important if Physical Motion can be changed, along with Personal Behavioral Traits without the self or another Physical Being’s Intervention or Words.

Case Study:
One person lived in a Violent Environment (non-named), while the other was a “Newton.” The Newton was obese, in comparison to his Brother, who was tall and skinny. The obese one was liked, irregardless of his weight, but there was no physical contact between the unnamed person with one of the Newton’s and there was physical contact with the other Newton (a kiss).

Newton 1: Engaged in Drug Activity, as the drug was being investigated and showed evidence and benefits of weight loss, even though it was against the law. He engaged in criminal activity and made one threatening statement. When another drug was introduced, where Newton and the Unnamed Party was present, the drug didn’t have the expected affect on the unnamed party, proving drug effects are independent of a user. The unnamed person was being harassed and mocked, felt unsafe and requested someone take her home. She was over 100 miles from home with a group of people she didn’t find trustworthy.

Newton 1 took went with the Unnamed person, along with a driver back to her region. Newton claimed she was a NARC (or Narcotics Officer). She assured him she wasn’t and was shocked by his odd behavior, clearly a drug reaction, out of fear of harm. He did not harm the NARC, but went on abusing drugs, never really getting to optimal physical fitness.

Newton 2: Never engaged in illegal drug activity, but used alcohol and was close friends’ with the NARCs Rapist’s Family. Neither Newton’s knew about the Rape or their connection with a Rapist.

Newton 1 went on to marry one of the NARCs friends and got pregnant. She lost the baby to miscarriage because she was on drugs. Newton 2 went on to marry an Iranian by the name of Sherry and worked at a gas station for many years. He became a real estate agent, bought a home in Spring Valley and had a little girl named Summer. The string of ‘extra-marital’ cheating and behavior continued years later in another environment 500 miles away, where the brother (Iranian) made sexual advances at the NARC.

ARE ACTIONS DUPLICATED AND IF SO, WHAT IS THE CRITERIA AND WHAT PARTY DRIVES THE NEGATIVE ACTION? RATIO’S IN PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE, LAW, PERSONAL BEHAVIOR, CONSEQUENCE AND OUTCOMES MUST BE CONSIDERED; AS WELL AS THE LENGTH OF THE BEHAVIOR WITH BENEFITS VS LAW ITSELF.

DIVORCE SEEMS TO BE COMMON PLACE; WHERE 50% OR MORE MARRIAGES END FOR UNSPECIFIED REASONS (FINANCIAL, INFIDELITY, OTHER). IF CAUSES OF INFIDELITY AND COULD BE IDENTIFIED, THEN SCIENCE CAN ADVANCE TO REVIEW BOTH CAUSE AND EFFECT, GOING BACK TO PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE CASE and INVESTIGATING IT FROM INITIAL CONTACT TO SEPARATION AND COMPLETE SPLITS.

The Newton’s in this family were divorced and their Mother went on to marry a man by the last name of Tripp. Ms. Tripp worked for the school district and now works in a Grocery Store in a Financial Profession (the same line of work, but different locations as her oldest son, Newton2). They used to be a happy couple in the town, but the introduction of drugs may have been their downfall. Alcohol abuse must be taken into consideration.

THEIR NAMES MUST ALSO BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION ALONG WITH THEIR RELATIONS TO SIR ISAAC and “Tripppp” as in mind-blowing, confusing, mind-altering, fascinating or shocking. A widely held viewpoint and topic in relationship to (FAT) Albert Einstein must also be considered.

The Newton’s relatives were closely tied to a Rapists’ Family, in that the aunt was physically located next door to the Rapist. The Aunt began to seek the drug through the course of their work, family relations, and contracted Sugar Diabetes, either through the use of shared needles, poor nutrition, a Blood Stream problem, or maybe a communication problem. She ended up in a wheelchair (as stated, but not seen) and died not longer after a Marital Separation and Romantic Involvement with a Drug Dealer.

TWO OTHERS ENDED UP WHEELCHAIRS ALSO.

As reported today, isn’t Sugar Diabetes directly related to Obesity or just a Blood Disease in general?

The only link between this family and Sir Isaac Newton’s Laws of Mass x Acceleration is that, perhaps the Speed of Thought and Acceleration in the interest of Science of Language, Addictions, and Diseases; the Word Traveler comes first, making matters of Death first. If that’s not first, then another consideration should be Love and Attraction, Age, Weight, Marital Status, Addiction Connection to the Family, Law, Action, and Reactions. First, obviously, you have to understand what the Law is for: Motions in Court, Physical Motions, Violent Attack using Weight and bad circumstances? Communications? Death?

Mass x Acceleration was being reviewed at the same time by the Unnamed party for a mathematical test, taking into consideration physical weight, force, and fighting. Today, it’s being looked at for Speed of Thought, Weight Control (inertia), and other areas where speed and attraction (unattraction) and Mental Disorders play a part, including Family Communications, Fear, Abuse, Death, Choice, and Punishment.

The Drug no doubt has Addictive Properties, but that has been narrowed down to an Addictive Personality Type, where just because a person is addicted to one substance does not mean they are addicted to another substance of equal or lesser measure. It is to the extent of feeling good, purpose, acceptance, safety, financial obligations, and the law itself.

The Drug can now be purchased, as long as it is prescribed by a Doctor because it has been identified as an active ingredient in weight control, memory, focus, and speech. It is a controlled substance because it can be deadly or cause abnormal psychiatric reactions in certain environments.

Avatar

By Savvy